By: Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich
The Western media, led by
Israel, is hard at work
presenting Iran as a global threat. Even the brilliant and daring Stephan
Walt and John Mearsheimer who argue that the Israeli lobby has too much power
are not immune to the damaging sound waves of the controlled media, or the
feign-written pages of the newspapers.
Ironic, given that they write at
some length about AIPAC’s role in the media, yet they themselves fall in the
same trap as the rest of us, believing Israel’s propaganda that Ahmadinejad has
declared he is going to “wipe Israel off the face of the earth”, and that Iran
is on its way to build nuclear weapons; [i]
an allegation that thousands of inspection hours by the nuclear agency watchdog,
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has refuted. As for Ahmadinejad’s rhetoric – he can
never speak above the hateful, truth-aversion media controlled by AIPAC, for
even an Iranian-Jew parliamentary who challenged Ahmadinejad to explain his
‘statement’ is not heard in the American media.[ii]
What is disquieting is for the world
to lend ears to these incredulous stories and believe that Iran is a
threat. Recent headlines read that
the Bush overture to Iran
splits Israel and the neo-cons. While wisdom would dictate that
Iran’s enemies maintain a low
profile, (http://www.forward.com/main/printer-friendly.php?id=7937)
other more aggressive steps are being suggested to counter the malaise
among the Israelis and the neo-cons.
On June 24, 2006, Jonathan Ariel
of Israeli News Agency, in a shocking article entitled “Israel Needs a Preemptive Nuclear Strike Against
Iran”[iii],
suggested a pre-emptive NUCLEAR
strike against Iran. My initial shock was why is the world
not outraged? After all, the Israelis have the capability. Terminology such as ‘Islamo-Nazi’ is
alien to us, referring, I assume, to genocide. But it is not new to them; this will not
be their first time.
“Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew who
had come to America in order to escape Hitler’s clutches, having lost his whole
family to Hitler’s systematic killing of Jews, gypsies, communists, and other
undesirables, was determined to wake up the world’s consciousness and pass a law
to stop genocide. He was looking
for a word to coin the term - An all encompassing word that would describe the
assaults on all aspects of nationhood – physical, biological, political, social,
cultural, economic and religious.
He wanted to connote not only full-scale extermination but also Hitler’s
other means of destruction: mass deportation, the lowering of birthrate by
separating men from women, economic exploitation, progressive starvation, and
the suppression of the intelligentsia who served as national leaders.”[iv]
Thus he combined the Greek derivative geno, meaning “race”, or “tribe”, and
the Latin derivative cide meaning
“killing”.
Iran is blameless. A past free of committing acts of
genocide and no intentions of ever wanting to embark on one. Nor does it have atomic weapons. Can Israel declare the
same?
- On April 9, 1948, more
than 250 villagers at Deir Yassin were massacred by a Jewish underground group
known as Lohamei Herut Yisraeil led by Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir. The intention was to strike terror into
the Palestinian population and frighten the people into leaving (in effect,
deportation). Following the
massacre, Zionist forces drove into Arab villages with loudspeaker trucks
shouting “run with your lives unless you want another Deir Yassin”. Virtually the entire population of two
major Palestinian towns, Lydda and Ramle, which were numbered some 50,000-70,000
were stampeded by the Yishuv’s army.[v]
-
The illegal barrier which prevents
the Palestinians to go to work and deprives them of their
livelihood.
-
Withholding funds and encouraging
the international community to do likewise creating one of the worst
humanitarian crisis in the Gaza and West Bank.
-
More than 100,000 Palestinians
worked in Israel in the late 1980s, mainly in menial and poorly paid jobs. In the first 20 years of occupation, $1
billion was deducted from wages of Palestinians employed in Israel for
employment benefits for which they were ineligible.[vi]
-
Women and children being held in
prison – especially children.
Lowering birthrate.
Under Lemkin’s description of
genocide, its treatment of Palestinians, and its constant threat to Iran with
its arsenal of some 200-300 nuclear warheads, is a threat to humanity, Iran is
not. The media’s attention has been
focused on Iran with ramblings about religious fanaticism. In truth, if state and religion are
not kept apart, then there will be wars.
However, it would a mistake to think that Israel is a secular democracy
and different from Iran.
Israel’s electoral system is based
on proportional representation which awards seats in the Knesset (parliament) to
parties in exact proportion to their share of the total vote. Even the Mapai, Israel’s major labor
party, could not obtain a majority vote. As such, it had to incorporate religious
parties in order to form government.
While the Mapai had a free hand at defense, the religious faction took
over education and introduced religion in public schools. All Israelis are subjected to religious
law in their personal lives, which among them means that there is no secular
marriage or divorce, hence women cannot initiate divorce![vii] I wonder if women’s rights’ group has
ventured into Israel?
While Israel wishes to see Iran
destroyed so that they realize what Max Nordau said (a close friend of Herzl’s):
“[W]e are going to Palestine to extend the moral boundaries of Europe as far as
the Euphrates.”[viii],
a genocide of this magnitude, will not go unnoticed. Taking on the world, is not an easy
task.
[i] (Foreign Policy – July/August pp58-66 foreign
policy.com).
[iv] Samantha Power “A Problem From Hell: America
and the Age of Genocide”. Perennial NY 2002
[v] James A Bill and Robert Springborg. “Politics in
the Middle East”. Addison Wesley Longman, NY,
2000 5th edition p231-2
[vi] Raja Shehadeh. “Occupiers: Law and the Uprising”
Journal of Palestine Studies 67 (Spring 1988)
:33
[vii] James A Bill and Robert Springborg. “Politics in
the Middle East”. Addison Wesley Longman, NY,
2000 5th edition p242-3
[viii] Cited by Kenneth Brown, “Iron and a King: The
Likud and Oriental Jews”, Merip Reports 114 (May
1983):7.
... Payvand News - 6/28/06 ... --