By Dr. Abbas Bakhtiar
Anyone remotely familiar with the
American political landscape knows that the Israeli lobby plays a very large
role in shaping
But somehow along the way, some of
these organisations were hijacked by Zionists who equated Jewishness with being
the loyal supporter of
These lobbying groups have consistently worked to advance their perceived interest of Israel around the world, not realising that their policies and actions may not be in the long-term interest of the state of Israel and even be counterproductive to the Jews’ interest around the world. By relying on the force of money and media, they have tried hard to persuade people to see the world from their point of view; not noticing that extreme use of these tools will eventually create a counter reaction.
After having succeeded in penetrating the corridors of power, these groups have become over-confident and arrogant. What used to be suggested is now demanded. What was previously politely asked for is now commanded. How long can this continue before it triggers a terrible reaction is anyone’s guess; but it surely can not continue unchecked for long.
The strength of these groups have
increased to such a level that now they can determine the outcome of elections
(through money and the media). The situation has gotten so bad that now, most of
the congressional hopefuls (Democrats and Republicans), even presidential
hopefuls, have to declare their absolute support for
One of these pro-Israel lobbying groups is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). We know of course that AIPAC has some very wealthy members. These supporters (official/unofficial) also control major part of the media. Money and media are the things that determine the outcome of most elections. So it is not surprising to see that most politicians and government officials always try to stay on extremely friendly terms with AIPAC and its clones.
But things have gotten out of hand.
One no longer can determine where the
“While reportedly under investigation for her ties to an influential pro-Israel lobbying organization, California Rep. Jane Harman last month hosted a private dinner for the group that was attended by two top Bush administration officials—Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte and Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff.
Sept. 13 dinner took place at the home of Harman, the ranking Democrat on the
House Select Committee on Intelligence, and was attended by over 120 top
financial backers of the American
Why was California Rep. Jane Harman being investigated?
has been looking into claims since mid-2005 that Harman of California, the top
Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, made explicit pledges to the American
The Washington Post reports one of those pledges was that for AIPAC's help, she would ask Republican administration officials to ease up on a probe of two former AIPAC lobbyists charged with violating the Espionage Act by receiving national defense information and transmitting it to journalists and Israeli Embassy employees. News of the FBI's investigation first appeared Friday in Time magazine.”[]
What is being produced in the intelligence committee? It is Intelligence assessments of course. The very thing that can be used to justify wars such as the one going on in Iraq or the one that is contemplated for Iran.
of the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency said in a letter that
the report contained some "erroneous, misleading and
unsubstantiated statements." The letter, signed by a senior director
at the agency, was addressed to Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.), chairman of the
House intelligence committee, which issued the
report. A copy was hand-delivered to Gregory L. Schulte, the
and then, through these scandals we get a glimpse of the power of AIPAC. We have
a top elected official pledging allegiance to a lobby group for
seems what is very obvious to outsiders, is still unknown to the American
people. Even after scandal after scandal, the things continue as before. The
If I was an American I would ask my
President to explain why some lobbyist like Abramoff would know about the plans
for invasion of
From Abramoff, Jack (Dir-DC-Gov)
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:31 AM
Subject: RE: Sunday
I was sitting yesterday with
Octagon1 is the handle for Jack Abramoff’s friend which apparently was an Israeli official.
Exactly one year after Mr.
Abramoff’s email to his Israeli friend, President Bush informed
the American people that having tried all diplomatic avenues to solve the
Iraqi “crisis”; he had no choice but to invade
March 18, 2003
Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)
Consistent with section 3(b) of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243), and based on information available to me, including that in the enclosed document, I determine that:
(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic and other peaceful means alone will neither (A) adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq nor (B) likely lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and
(2) acting pursuant to the Constitution and Public Law 107-243 is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.
GEORGE W. BUSH
Well, it seems to me that some
lobbyists knew much more about
Or may be AIPAC wanted to talk to
these gentlemen about Jonathan Pollard, a convicted Israeli spy and a former
United States Naval civilian intelligence analyst. After all, recently most of
the Israeli newspapers have been saying that Mr. Pollard should be released and
Or may be they wanted to know about
the US intelligence agencies’ progress in finding the supposedly,
In the 11 years since former Navy
analyst Jonathan Jay Pollard was convicted of selling
After all, during Monica Lewinsky affair, there were strong rumours that the President was being pressured to forget about Mega or else.
The British investigative journalist
Kevin Dowling has released an article for publication to a variety of British
and American news organizations, charging that the Israeli Mossad was bugging
the Watergate apartment telephone of Monica Lewinsky, and was able to obtain
material used to blackmail the
Dowling reports that well-placed sources in Tel Aviv say that full transcripts of more than 30 sexually explicit conversations between Clinton and Lewinsky are held by the Israeli foreign intelligence service, the Mossad.
The backdrop is as follows, Dowling
reports, and it is backed up by published sources in the
In May of 1997, the Washington Post
and other media reported that the U.S. National Security Agency had intercepted
a phone conversation between a Mossad officer posted at the Israeli embassy in
Washington, and Danny Yaton, the Mossad chief, in Tel Aviv, during January 1997.
The Mossad agent was seeking clarification whether he should attempt to obtain a
copy of private letter from then-Secretary of State Warren Christopher to Yassir
Arafat, via a Mossad mole high-up in the
Comparisons to the Pollard spy
affair were naturally raised; the deeper issue is that many observers believe
that Pollard's controller (sometimes referred to as "Mr.. X," or the "X
Committee") is still burrowed deep in a high-level position in a
According to the Tel Aviv sources
cited by Dowling, there was an emergency meeting of top Israeli intelligence
officials, as soon as the NSA intercept was discovered; a Mossad
electronic-bugging team of yalohim was dispatched to
According to the Dowling sources,
the Mossad obtained wiretap tapes of at least 30 X-rated conversations between
the President and Lewinsky. These tapes, according to the sources, were
hand-carried back to Tel Aviv, and were then used to blackmail the
Or may be they wanted to talk about
The immediate issues of illegal
receipt of classified information, possible espionage, and failure to register
under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) are bad enough, but the larger
issue is the exposure of AIPAC's operating methods. The FBI has a couple of
years' worth of wiretap evidence, and the information initially leaked to Rosen
and Weissman by Larry Franklin was linked to the push for war with
Or maybe the AIPAC financial backers simply wanted to know about all those Israeli agents that were arrested right after 9/11.
FBI Investigates Foreign Spy Ring –
U.S. Companies Deny Involvement
In the wake of the Sept. 11
terrorist attacks, the FBI reportedly stumbled on an espionage ring that had
penetrated the wiretapping system of
In a follow-up to these reports, the FBI did not deny that such actions had been taken. However, FBI spokesman Paul Bresson would not answer specific questions on the reported espionage.
"We have seen the Fox News segments that aired several weeks ago on this topic and found some inaccuracies with it. Because they are sensitive issues, I do not have the luxury of discussing what precisely was accurate and what was inaccurate about their reporting," stated Paul Bresson, spokesman for the FBI.
"Most of the questions [asked by NewsMax.com] are not directly answerable by CALEA [Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act]. Your questions may be more properly addressed to our National Security Division, which I know would never discuss this with you, unfortunately," stated Bresson
Are Israeli Spies in the
"First, they have taken advantage of
a technically bumbling and compromised law enforcement and counterintelligence
community and may have essentially made
"They have used their technical expertise in-house to identify and exploit cutting-edge technologies and companies. In gaining control over those technologies and companies, they would also have shown a deft handling of merger and acquisitions, personnel recruitment, and playing the capital markets.
"In addition, as publicly traded companies, private and institutional investors from around the world would be funding Israeli intelligence activities. Again, pretty impressive, if true, and really pretty much the model, or a variation of the model, now used by the intelligence agencies of China, Russia and some of our European allies," said Brown.
"If they [the Fox reports] do turn out to expose Israeli intelligence operations, one's admiration for Israeli ingenuity would be more than tempered by amazement at the sheer stupidity and recklessness of the Israelis' actions," noted Brown.
"First, they would have seriously
damaged their relationship with the
"Second, while Israel, like the prodigal son, will always be able to ultimately rely on America's protection, Israeli high-tech companies are a major target for Russian intelligence and organized crime," stated Brown.[]
 Fox News, “FBI Investigating
Whether Harman Made Improper Promises to Pro-Israel Group”,
 Time, “HUNT FOR A MOLE:IS
 What Really Happened, “DID
THE MOSSAD BUG MONICA (HONEY TRAP) LEWINSKY'S PHONE?”,
 Gorilla in the room, “Rosen and
Weissman Refuse to Take the Fall for AIPAC”,
 NewsMax.com, “FBI Investigates
Foreign Spy Ring - U.S. Companies Deny Involvement”,
... Payvand News - 11/6/06 ... --