Public statement by Amnesty International
Amnesty International
deplores the executions earlier today of four Iranian Arab men and fears for the
lives of other prisoners who are reported to have been sentenced to death
recently following unfair trials.
Amnesty International
is calling on the Iranian authorities to halt executions and to ensure that all
persons in detention are protected from torture or other
ill-treatment.
Executions in
Iran continue at an alarming rate.
Amnesty International recorded at least 177 executions in 2006 but fears that
the true figure may have been much higher. At least four of those executed were
under the age of 18 at the time of their alleged offences, including one who was
still under 18 at the time of his execution. In 2006, Iran and Pakistan were the only countries in the world to
continue to execute child offenders (although Pakistan enacted
in 2000 the Juvenile Justice System Law which abolished the death penalty for
people under 18 at the time of the crime in most parts of the country). To date
in 2007, Amnesty International has recorded 19 further executions in
Iran, including the four today.
Those executed today
are believed to be Khalaf Derhab Khudayrawi, Alireza Asakreh, Mohammad Jaab Pour
and Abdulamir Farjallah Jaab. They were among 10 men, all members of Iran's Arab
minority, who were reportedly convicted of being mohareb (at enmity with
God) on account of their alleged involvement in bomb attacks in October 2005
which caused the deaths of at least six people and wounded more than a hundred
others, in Ahvaz city, Khuzestan province. According to reports, the four men
were denied access to their lawyers in the two weeks prior to their
execution.
On 9 November 2006,
the head of the Khuzestan Prosecutor’s Office, Abbas Ja’afari Dowlat Abadi,
reportedly announced that the Supreme Court had upheld the death sentences
against 10 of some 19 people allegedly responsible for bomb explosions in
Khuzestan and that they would be publicly hanged.
On 13 November 2006,
an Iranian local television station, Khuzestan TV, broadcast a documentary film
which included the “confessions” of nine of these men, In the programme, the 10
people, said to be members of a group named Al-e Naser, (a little-known
Iranian Arab militant group that is not known to have been active since the time
of the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s) "confessed" to their involvement in the bomb
explosions.
On 19 December 2006
three of them, Abdullah Suleymani (initially named as Alireza Asakreh), Malek
Banitamim and Ali Matouri Zadeh were reportedly executed in prison in Khuzestan
province.
The bodies of the
executed men were reportedly not handed to their families for burial, and there
were fears that they would be buried in an unmarked, mass grave site called
La’natabad (Place of the damned). The security forces reportedly
prevented people from visiting the families to offer
condolences.
According to
information received by Amnesty International, on or around 2 March 2006
and prior to his arrest, Khalaf Derhab Khudayrawi was reportedly shot by the
security forces before being taken away. His family believed he had died
in the shooting, but a few days later received a phone call from the authorities
informing them that he had been transferred to the Sepidar detention centre. His
wife, Soghra Khudayrawi, and four-year-old son Zeidan were detained in Ahvaz on 7 March
2006 and both remain in detention. (See UA 65/06, MDE 13/028/2006, 23 March
2006) and Iran: Appeal Case: Four Ahwazi
Arab women and two children: Prisoners of conscience, AI Index: MDE
13/059/2006, 17 May 2006, http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE130592006?open&of=ENG-IRN).
Mohammad Jaab Pour and Abdulamir Farjallah Jaab were also reportedly arrested on
7 March 2006.
At the beginning of
June 2006, seven lawyers who appeared before Branch 3 of the Revolutionary Court
representing the defendants, including some of the 10 who were sentenced to
death, reportedly wrote formally to the court’s president complaining about
irregularities in the trial. They said they were notified of their clients’
trial date only one to two days in advance, instead of the minimum of five days
stipulated in Article 64 of the Civil Procedure Code, and could not study their
clients’ files fully; that they were not allowed to meet in private with their
clients although they had requested this and despite the head of the judiciary’s
stated assurance on 20 May 2006 that “nobody has the right to issue an order
in contravention of the law and to deprive the accused of the right of visits by
their family and lawyer. They must know quite clearly that they may request
private meetings with their lawyers.”
The lawyers also complained that trial sessions have been held without
other defendants or their lawyers being present.
Following this letter,
in October 2006 at least five of the lawyers were summoned to appear before
Branch 7 of the Revolutionary
Court in Ahwaz for
allegedly endangering national security by complaining about the legal
proceedings and publishing their protest on Ahwazi websites abroad. They were
reportedly released upon payment of bail.
On 10 January 2007,
three leading UN human rights experts - Philip Alston, UN Special Rapporteur on
extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; Leandro Despouy, UN Special
Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, and Manfred Nowak, UN
Special Rapporteur on torture – jointly called on the government of Iran to
“stop the imminent execution of seven men belonging to the Ahwazi Arab minority
and grant them a fair and public hearing.” The seven individuals concerned were
reported to be Abdulreza Sanawati Zergani, Qasem Salamat, Mohammad Jaab Pour,
Abdulamir Farjallah Jaab, Alireza Asakreh, Majed Alboghubaish Khalaf and Derhab
Khudayrawi. These UN experts stated: “We are fully aware that these men are
accused of serious crimes… However, this cannot justify their conviction and
execution after trials that made a mockery of due process requirements.”
BACKGROUND
INFORMATION
Much of
Iran’s Arab community lives
in the province of Khuzestan, which borders Iraq. The
province is strategically important because it is the site of much of
Iran’s oil reserves, but the Arab
population does not feel it has benefited as much from the oil revenue as
the Persian population. Historically, the Arab community has been marginalised
and discriminated against. In April 2005, Iranian Arabs took part in mass
demonstrations in Ahvaz city, after it was alleged that the
government planned to disperse the country's Arab population or to force them to
relinquish their Arab identity. Hundreds were arrested and some were reportedly
tortured. Following bomb explosions in Ahvaz city in June and October 2005,
which killed at least 14 people, and explosions at oil installations in
September and October, the cycle of violence intensified, with hundreds people
reportedly arrested. Further bombings on 24 January 2006, in which at least six
people were killed, were followed by further mass arrests. Two men, Mehdi
Nawaseri and Ali Awdeh Afrawi, were executed in public on 2 March 2006 after
they were convicted of involvement in the October bombings. Their executions
followed unfair trials before a Revolutionary Court during which they are
believed to have been denied access to lawyers, and their "confessions", along
with those of seven other men, were broadcast on television.
Amnesty International
condemns bomb explosions and other attacks against civilians and fully
recognizes the right and responsibility of governments to bring to justice those
suspected of criminal offences, but in doing so governments must comply with
their obligations under international human rights law, including the right of
fair trial. Amnesty International is unconditionally opposed to the death
penalty as a violation of the right to life and the ultimate form of cruel and
inhuman punishment. Please see Iran: Death Sentences
appeal case – 11 Iranian Arab men facing death sentences, AI Index MDE
13/051/2006, May 2006, http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE130512006?open&of=ENG-IRN
.
Iran has a history of
airing video-taped "confessions" on television. In previous cases, people who
have made such "confessions" have later stated that such confessions were made
after they had been tortured or ill-treated.
Iran is a state party to
the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which includes
the right not to be compelled to testify against oneself or to confess guilt
(Article 14.3.g). Principle 21 of the UN Body of Principles for the Protection
of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment states that it should
be prohibited to take undue advantage of the situation of a detainee for
the purpose of compelling him to confess or incriminate himself.
... Payvand News - 1/25/07 ... --