By Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich
The concoction becomes lethal. America’s relentless drive to dominate the Middle
East and its oil, blends well with Israel’s insatiable appetite for
water and unstoppable expansion. It
is said that oil and water do not mix – but when they do, it becomes a lethal
concoction with no easy solution.
The fatal blend engulfing the Middle
East today seems to have no end in sight other than darker clouds
showering more innocent blood.
The relationship between
war and resources is nothing new.
“One drop of oil,” said Georges Clemenceau, the Prime Minister of France
in the second half of World War I, “is worth one drop of blood of our
soldiers.” Today, the
U.S. policy makers seem to think that
one drop of oil is worth one drop of blood of soldiers and the slaughter of
thousands of Arab and Muslim
lives. However, to cover their
racist ambitions, they disguise their greed as ‘war on terror’ or
‘democratization’. Knowing that by controlling the world's
energy resources in conjunction with the superiority of the U.S. military, the United States
would be able to intimidate and coerce the world more effectively, oil
policy--wars or covert actions -- have become the overriding determinant of the
American foreign policy.
In a New York Times article
on February 24, 2006, “Ted Koppel responded to what he described as the Bush
administration's "touchiness" about the charge that we are in Iraq because of
oil by stating the obvious, though often unsaid, truth, "Now that's curious.
Keeping oil flowing out of the Persian Gulf and through the Strait of Hormuz has been bedrock American foreign policy
for more than half a century." Today control over the world's oil supply is at
the forefront of Washington policy makers'
thinking, even if the president and his team deny any such intent and talk
publicly of reducing dependence on Middle East
oil by three-quarters of present levels, an absurdly impossible goal. Two-thirds
of the oil in the world is in the Middle East, much of it under
Iraq and Iran, the axis
of oil, the current targets of the U.S. War on Terrorism. Control of oil is
integral to Washington's official goal of world
domination, a goal stated this baldly in national security documents.”[i]
While oil is the primary
motive for the United States,
water ideology and expansion are Israel’s motives for giving the Bush
administration reason for war, leaving Israel room to benefit from the Bush
administration’s ambitions.
In an astonishing
interview[ii],
the world renowned Israeli military strategist, Martin Van Creveld, whose books
are required reading for the U.S. Army officers, revealed that there was “no
danger at all of having an Iranian nuclear weapon dropped on us. We cannot say
so too openly, however, because we have a history of using any threat in order
to get weapons. And it works beautifully: Thanks to Iranian threat, we are
getting weapons from U.S. and
Germany. I think some people in
Israel are deliberately exaggerating
our fears because it prompts the response, "Oh, those poor Jews. They're going
to have the Holocaust again. Give them weapons"[iii].
Israel needs weapons for wars of
aggression and expansion. In its
nascent stages, Zionism not only advocated a return to Palestine, but also the redemption of the Jewish people
through agrarian physical labor, “and the transformation and rebirth of the
‘wasteland’ of Palestine into a ‘land of milk and
honey’”. The goal of the
early Zionist leadership became not only to secure all water resources, but
control them at their sources.[iv] Following independence, the same
doctrine continued.
Israel continued its
policy of establishing Jewish settlements in areas of Arab majority (e.g.
Galilee) as well as peripheral areas alongside the borders of
Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and the Negev. Saul
Arlosoroff, Chairman of the Israel-Water Engineers Association
says:
“The whole philosophy of the Zionist
movement was that you maintain control of the land, over your country, by
working there and being there.
There’s no doubt that if
they move out of the border with Lebanon, somebody else will be there,
and that somebody is Arabs, not Jews, and the government of Israel doesn’t want
Arabs to be there on the border, because the border will move further and
further south. The same is true in
the Negev.”
Although today Israel imports most of its food staples from the
US, and while agriculture is
economically insignificant, in territorial-political terms it is of utmost
importance. In July 2006, Israel bombed and destroyed Lebanon for 33
days as the world stood by. This
was oil and water mixing.
Israel did not want
Arabs on the border, the United States wanted Hezbollah
disabled, a fact readily admitted by then ambassador to the United Nations, John
Bolton[v].
In January the Jerusalem Post
announced that Israel the
Israeli Air Force had plans to buy military equipment from the
United
States that would help transform regular
missiles into precision, satellite-guided weapons. Israel is busy bombing and destroying Palestine and the Gaza at the moment. While on the other hand, it would seem
that even a year is too long for the people of Lebanon to
recover from destruction and death.
Lebanon is being subjected to
internal conflict; Arab is being set up against Arab. After the renowned investigative
reporter Sy Hersh revealed that the United
States, the Saudis, and the Siniora government are engaged
in covert operations in funding and supporting the Jihadist movements in
Lebanon in a fight against Hezbollah,
the Bush White House had to reveal that it was sending military aid to the
Lebanese army[vi].
Once the administration is assured
of a full scale civil war which will no doubt engage Hezbollah, the
U.S. will attack
Iran.
The stage has been set. As nine more U.S. warships enter the
Persian Gulf threatening Iran, and with news leaked (informative leak in this
writer’s opinion) that the Bush administration has authorized new covert actions
against Iran, it is undoubtedly a sign that Bush & Co. hope to provoke a
strong reaction from Iran in an attempt to justify a military attack. Having convinced the world that Iran’s
nuclear program is an existential threat to Israel, and outrageous accusations
abound, where even the once reputable paper The Guardian is repeating the warmongers
allegations of linking Iran with al-Qaeda, the only enemy recognized by the less
savvy global citizen, and those thought to have been responsible for 9/11- given
that perhaps differentiating between Sunni and Shiite may be too much of a
burden for some to consume,[vii] the U.S. seeks to commit mass murder for
the sake of power and greed while Israel will expand
unhindered.
One has to wonder how many more
millions have to be slaughtered before the collective consciousness of humanity
is stirred into action. Has the
ongoing stench of the genocidal concoction obscured our compassion? Perhaps the fatal potion brings with it
another message - shame? Or perhaps even a glimmer of hope that there is still
time.
http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=1841
[i] Tabb, William, K. “Monthly Review.”
New York:Jan
2007. Vol. 58, Iss. 8, p. 32-42
[ii] Levin, R. “Reality Fights: The Future of War, A talk with military
theorist Martin Van Creveld” Playboy Magazine. June 2007, pages
52-53
[iv] Selby, Jan. “Water, Power & Politics in the Middle East: The Other Israel-Palestinian Conflict”
Palgrave & MacMillan NY:2003 pp65-69
... Payvand News - 5/25/07 ...