By Leta Hong Fincher, VOA, Washington
As Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad continues his controversial visit to the United
States, Iran has emerged as a major issue in the 2008 U.S. presidential
campaign. Leading candidates for the presidency are presenting different
approaches to what they see as a growing threat from Iran's suspected nuclear
weapons program. VOA's Leta Hong Fincher has more on what some of the
presidential contenders are saying.
 |
| Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
speaks at Columbia University in New York, 24 Sept 2007
|
Mr.
Ahmadinejad's appearance at Columbia University in New York on Monday, September
24th, sparked outrage among some of the Republican presidential contenders. But
former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was the only candidate to oppose the
United Nations' decision to allow Mr. Ahmadinejad to speak to the General
Assembly on Tuesday.
Mr. Romney, a Republican presidential candidate
commented, "It's simply unacceptable to bring a man to the world stage who has
called for the elimination of another nation, has called for, in various terms,
genocide, and is developing, contrary to the demands of the United Nations,
nuclear weapons that would allow him to carry out genocide."
Romney has called for Mr. Ahmadinejad to be indicted
for genocide, and he says there should be tighter sanctions against
Iran.
Another Republican presidential candidate, former New
York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, has repeatedly said the United States must make it
clear that it will not allow Iran to become a nuclear power. Giuliani said in a
presidential debate in June that he would not rule out using "tactical" nuclear
weapons against Iran. "Iran is a threat, a nuclear threat and not just
because they can deliver a nuclear warhead with missiles. They are a nuclear
threat because they are the biggest state sponsor of terrorism and they can hand
nuclear materials to terrorists."
Other leading Republican presidential contenders
agree that the United States should not rule out military action against Iran to
keep it from developing nuclear weapons.
Candidates from the Democratic Party vary more on how
they say they would treat Iran, but many are calling for intensified diplomatic
efforts.
Senator Barack Obama says he finds many of Mr.
Ahmadinejad's statements "odious." But Obama says he would be willing, as
president, to meet with the Iranian leader to protect U.S. interests. "As John
F. Kennedy said, 'We should never negotiate out of fear, but should never fear
to negotiate.' And by us listening to the views of even those who we violently
disagree with, that sends a signal to the world that we are going to turn the
page on the failed diplomacy that the Bush administration has practiced for so
long."
Obama has clashed with his Democratic rival, Senator
Hillary Clinton, over their foreign policy judgment. At a debate in July, Obama
said he would be willing to meet with foreign leaders -- including those of Iran
and North Korea -- without preconditions.
Clinton criticized Obama's remarks as "irresponsible
and naïve." She said she would not promise to meet any leaders without
preconditions because she did not want to be used for "propaganda purposes." "I
will use a lot of high-level presidential envoys to test the waters, to feel the
way," she said. "But certainly we're not going to just have our president meet
with Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez and, you know, the president of North Korea,
Iran and Syria until we know better what the way forward would be."
Both Clinton and Obama say they do not rule out
military force against Iran to keep it from developing nuclear
weapons.