By
Mehdi Amini
Back in 2001, when
Khatami was in his second term as the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran,
I wrote a piece in Iranian.com, titled "Slowly
but surely", on why I voted for him. As expected it was criticized
by some and approved by others. In that article, I posed a question that asked
"Are we better off now compared to four years ago or not? "
The next
presidential election is to take place June of 2009 and there is rumor in the
Iranian political scene that Khatami may try a comeback. Before I ask my
question I want to put everyone at ease. I WILL VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN SHOULD
HE DECIDE TO RUN! Not that it matters to me if he wins or not, since I
am sitting in conformity outside Iran, but rather for those living in Iran who
have to deal with Ahmadinejad day in and day out!
So I will pose the
same question again seven years later in a different form. "Are those living in
Iran better off now compared to four years ago or not? " To answer this
question you do not have to be a rocket scientist but you do have to be fair
minded.
To be fair, just
do a little comparison of today and when Khatami's time in office. Today when a
newspaper closes down, no new one pops up after it. In today's Iran any
critical views even by those close to Ahmadinejad are dealt with harshest
manner! In today's Iran women are sent to jail for wanting equal rights. In
today's Iran no more criticizing the President. Let alone Veliate Faghih. In
today's Iran, many people who visit Iran, they meet the intelligence apparatus
before they could meet their family.
By no means does
it mean that Khatami's era was ideal to what I envision for Iran. My ideal
situation is when we have a secular republic vs. an Islamic Republic; where
every man, women and child, irrespective of their thinking, religion, ethnicity
or sexual orientation are treated equal. Where ones human rights are respected
no matter who you are! Where critics of the state are not forced to escape Iran
into the arms of the Iranian Government counterparts in the United States! Where
trade unionists are not imprisoned for what they joined together! Where death
penalty is not an acceptable punishment!
Where people
wanting to participate in the elections do not have to go through a vetting
process! Where ……!
The Islamic
Republic of Iran is one of the most repressive regimes in the world but it is
the Iranian people who must deal with it. And one thing that I hope my critics
will agree with me is that it must go! But the question is how and in what
manner.
Another point that
I think my critics may agree with me is that no one else can dictate to us what
kind of a government we want and no one else can bring democracy for us. Again
I hope that's the same sentiment my critics have.
What may
differentiate me with my critics is on how the IR must go? As I stated before
and repeat now, I do not believe in revolution but a "Refolution."
Iran has a very
dynamic and sophisticated society that even the smartest political scientist
cannot say what will happen in a few years…the Iranian People have learned
through the years how to oppose this government and how to deal with it. But I
am very confident that eventually they will take things into their own hands and
hopefully for better and hopefully peacefully! As I stated before, I rather
see a change that is gradual but deeply rooted. It may never happen in my life
time but so be it!
Irrespective of
what I wish or want, which does not make an impact on what happens inside Iran,
next question is what do we do outside Iran?
The fact of the
matter is that Bush's Presidency is about to come to an end and one thing we are
not certain is, will he launch an attack on Iran before he leaves office. Or
will Israel attack Iran or not? No matter what your ideas are about the future
of Iran, whether a monarchist dreaming that Reza Pahlavi takes over his dad
reign or a secularist republican as I am, you do not wish to see a nation
destroyed. Because that's exactly what will happen to Iran if they decide to
bomb it! It may very well be the end of Iran as we know it!
So at this
critical juncture, what can unite the Iranians abroad is its opposition to a
possible attack on Iran. This does not mean that you put aside your opposition
to the Islamic Republic of Iran or even side with them, but rather you are
siding with the Iranian People who will be the main victims of such an event.
Opposing the war
does not mean that you cannot criticize the Islamic Republics policies toward
its citizens. We must pressure Iran on its human rights policies.
The condition in
the Middle East is fragile enough. Having another war in the region not only
will impact Iran, but the region and the world.
... Payvand News - 08/08/08 ...
Bookmark/Share this post with:
Delicious |
Digg |
Facebook |
Furl |
Google |
Magnolia |
Newsvine |
Reddit |
Yahoo
© Copyright 2008 NetNative
(All Rights Reserved)
|
|
#