By:
Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich
Once again the neo-cons have given Reza Pahlavi
a platform, but it is not clear who the intended audience is. The feigned
altruistic appeal in his speech bears an eerie resemblance to the rehearsed
Iraqi appeals before that country was invaded. Those appeals cost over one
million Iraqi lives. This is a well-written speech, disguised as it may be, to
convince. Whether the speech was delivered to persuade the American public of
the necessity of intervention and war or the purpose of it was the alienation of
Iran's Arab neighbors, much like his father had in favor of Israel, one can be
certain that Norman Podhoretz has given it his blessings, if indeed he has not
been the writer himself.
[i]
It must be recalled that the
events of 9/11 and the tragedy that struck America transformed George W. Bush.
On November 19, 1999, Bush the candidate delivered a speech at the Ronald Reagan
library at Simi California saying: ..... "And let us have an American foreign
policy that reflects American character; the Modesty of true strength, the
humility of real greatness." However, 9/11 prompted him to turn over the
foreign policy of the country to the neo-cons who had been waiting in the wings
for decades, and who had planned the assault on the Middle East for over a
decade. They were ready with a response and in effect, they hijacked the
American foreign policy.
On September 20, 2001, Mr.
Bush's assertions were that the United States would pursue global terrorist
groups and any nation that harbors or supports terrorism. His National Security
Agenda (2002 NSS) was quintessentially neoconservative calling for preemption.
Underlying the Bush foreign policy is the assumption that the use of military
force to overthrow non cooperative governments in troubled areas is the remedy
for terrorism; a page from neo-con D. Perle's book "An End to Evil".
Pahlavi invites an attack on
Iran by stating that "Iran's clerical regime's continued support for
terrorism".
For neo-cons it is easy to
push their agenda and convince the general public that the policies being
implemented are based on American values as so many of them have careers in the
media or academia (they developed a close tie with Georgetown Center for
Strategic Studies among others). One such promoter of American 'values' is
Benador Associates.
Benador Associates arranges their TV
appearances and speaking engagements, and helps to place their articles in
newspapers. Ms. Benador, the founder of Benador Associates, along with Senator
Liberman is busy promoting Reza Pahlavi (Lieberman endorsed McCain who likes to
sing Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran). It is worthwhile mentioning another very
prominent Benador client and Reza Pahlavi's colleague and promoter.
Michael Ledeen, the contributing editor of
National Review Online has endorsed the "Total war strategy" - His idea is
advanced through Benador Associates. "Total War Strategy" was first put
forward by Adam G. Mersereau. Ledeen writes: "The method used to destroy Iran,
as known in the neo-con circle, will be "Total War". A total war strategy does
not have to include the intentional targeting of civilians, but the sparing of
civilian lives cannot be its first priority ... The purpose of total war is to
permanently force your will onto another people group."
[ii]
Pahlavi calls the regime in
Iran terrorists, aware that such definitions will draw the US military into a
bloody battle for the preemption doctrine - He is not mindful of the fact that
bringing death and destruction to innocent civilians is the ultimate in
terror. More importantly, language is the best tool for political and social
dominance. Those who 'own' the language can use value-laden terminology to
their great advantage and 'define' the other. Terrorism is the definition
given by the neo-cons to those they wish to master. It is only relevant if one
heeds it. The intellect is often sharper than the biting words. However, it
would seem that Reza Pahlavi has felt the need to adapt to his inferior
position and adapted to the prevailing definition of social order by trading
status for security.
Reza Pahlavi must also know
that Iran's history is filled with a pattern of external powers collaborating
and destroying the country's advancement in its nascent stages at every turn,
whether technological empowerment as in the case of the railway, or
socio-political, such as democracy and the nationalization of oil, or the
current self sufficiency in seeking nuclear technology.
He should recall that after
the concessions granted by the Persian government to the (Russian) Discount and
Loan Bank of Persia for the construction of the railway line Julfa-Tabriz
(1913), the 'allied' forces in line with Winston Churchill's advice, forced the
man who had built it, his grandfather, Reza Shah Pahlavi, to abdicate and leave
the country. Iran's democracy and its oil nationalization movement of 1951 to
1953 under Mossadegh were brought to an end by the British with the help of the
CIA-backed coup. His father owed his throne to the CIA, it is worthwhile
mentioning. Today, it seems that Reza Pahlavi is asking the same favor from
similar groups.
And his lack of
understanding of nuclear power...
Pahlavi should know that at
the Iraq war created a pro-natalist atmosphere.
Families were even given incentives to have more children. In addition, the
war caused immense
damage to the infrastructure prompting the new
government to rethink its position about starting up the nuclear power plants.
Furthermore, according to Saad Rahim, an analyst at Washington consultancy PFC
Energy claims that Iran needs to diversify its energy needs in addition to a
change in its policies, otherwise, "Iran's net crude exports could fall to
zero."[iii]
But since Pahlavi's concerns are to please the neocon bosses, and to convince
the American people that Iran is a threat, the truth is being concealed.
On every continent nuclear
and radiation techniques are put in the service of humankind. Recently, it was
witnessed that due to a
problem with a
Canadian nuclear reactor that produces medical isotopes used to diagnose and
treat cancer and cardiovascular disease, patients in Canada, U.S. and other
countries had their tests and treatment postponed
[iv]. Since Pahlavi is in the
U.S., he is no doubt indifferent to the plight of the Iranians and their
welfare.
Iranian
nationalists have asked the world at large, America in particular to leave them
alone. Pahlavi has no love for Iranians, much less an understanding of them[v].
Even the Cuban-Americans who have held the foreign policy of this country
towards Cuba hostage for decades, do not have the audacity to select a leader
and have someone represent Cuba from exile. A self-appointed traitor who has
surrendered his reins to the neo-cons does not speak for Iranians.
... Payvand News - 02/11/08 ... --