By Debbie Menon
|

Debbie Menon |
Obama victory offers best
chance in decades of direct Iran talks –AP report
I think this AP
report reflects to some degree the height of
fear and the depth of hopelessness to which eight years of the Bush
Administration has driven the world and the American nation of people. We need
to move beyond the fear mongering rhetoric.
How many countries besides
US/Israel has Ahmadinejad confronted verbally?
The only two who really matter
and who might have the transnational clout to bring down the opprobrium of his
own business people upon him.
This report, sounds like the
meddling and peddling of fear and influence I had in mind when I wrote of the
Dulles brothers and The United Fruit Company last week (read the
article).
Iran, and the "Iranian" threat
are, as we well know, a Bush/Cheney/Neocon inspired threat, a bogeyman created
to provide "justification" for further illegal activity in pursuit of their
hegemonistic goals in the Middle East, and in support of the Israeli agenda of a
Eretz Israel, home, promised Land of the Mensch, from Great River to Great
river.
Whatever actual threat Iran may
actually pose to anyone today is undoubtedly magnified completely out of
proportion to its reality and, is without doubt, the product and direct
consequence of such fear mongering, aggressive accusations, provocation and
saber-rattling on the part of the Bush/Cheney/Zionist/Neocon cabal.
So, an article like this which
touts the bare possibility of hope for even the opening of a discussion with
Iran, is a measure of how far we have been sunken in despair, that even the hope
of a chance to see the light is greeted with the elation which we might expect
when the lights actually come on.
Yes, Obama has indicated that he
may open talks with Iran. Whether this is pre-election campaign hype is yet to
be seen when the door opens.
Even so, it is a far cry above
and beyond anything we have heard from the Bush Administration who has
steadfastly even refused to consider the possibility of a dialogue. So far
above and beyond, that even the reporting of "the possibility of dialogue," is
received as if it has already been accomplished.
Talks are important. We know
that. But, talk is still cheap and ineffective until we see what is said, what
is agreed to, and the degree of sincerity with which those agreements, if any,
are followed up; or whether they are merely used, as Israel uses such failed
dialogues, as justification for even further persecution, invasion, abuse and
criminal threat and attack on a powerless neighbor.
Rahm Emanuel's selection to be
White House chief of staff is a very bad portend, for these
reasons:
-
In the US system, the
White House chief of staff is de facto a deputy president, the
second most powerful person in the government, far more powerful than almost any
Vice President, Speaker of the House of Representatives, or Cabinet secretary.
As one put it, "In his new job, Mr. Emanuel will be at the epicenter of every
major move the Obama administration makes." He is the last person a president
sees, and the last person whose words he hears, before making any policy
decision.
- Emanuel is the son of
an Irgun terrorist and a fanatical (some would be kind and say "strictly
observant") Orthodox Jew, who personally volunteered service with the IDF (not
the US Army) during the first Gulf War, and habitually spends his free time in
Tel Aviv, and whose father gave an interview following his appointment, in the
Jerusalem Post in which he stated bluntly that his son "did not go to the White
House to do the floors," (his phrase) will definitely encourage Obama to be
strongly pro-Israeli. AIPAC in its published statements agrees. And they are
both correct.
- The Jewish neo-conservatives certainly
have their major nest in the Republican Party. But the Democratic Party has
always been the home of the large majority of Jews (up to 90% in some states
register as Democrats), and therefore the home of most of their money. That is
reflected in the Congress, where almost all of the Jewish members of the House
and Senate are Democrats. Policy follows people and money,
and they have definitely captured the high ground in the Obama
administration-to-be, even more than in the Bush administration. About the only
thing it will be difficult for them to push, is a new war, because the Democrats
as a party have never gotten over the savaging their party took during and after
Vietnam, and are not generally inclined to go to war without enormous
provocation. So that may work to the benefit of (e.g.) Iran and Syria, but as
for the Palestinians? Forget it, absolutely nothing will change.
Israel's fear of Iran is their
fear of peace. Iran is a reservoir of resources and of self-confidence, which
can be contagious.
The Israeli militarists hate and
fear the possibility of peace. It means they will have
territorial limits. It means they have to comply with law. It means they cannot
do unlimited injustices to others. Hence the enmity towards Iran.
It never ceases to amaze me that Israelis seem not to understand their own
self-interests in this. Imagine the country and the region, if from 1948 the
Israelis had placed justice and equality as their highest principle, instead of
theft and racism. It would now be a prosperous and harmonious region, from
Syria, through Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, to Egypt. A kind of Mediterranean
California, with high-tech, big banks, and rich agriculture.
Hope is like credit...I suggest
that we not spend too much of it until the check has arrived and cleared the
bank, and we can deal with it as a fait accompli. Let us see what actually is
said when, and if they ever do, "sit at a table and talk."
Until then, it is remains a mere
tragic-comedy production which sells newspapers and TV advertising time.
And, that is all it is!
We should also bear in mind that
any Iranian response to any proposals or actions on the part of the US and its
ME Satellite Israel, will be fuelled by and also incorporate their reaction to
54 years of oppressive subjugation and domination by a US supported Pahlavi
dynasty exploitation and hundreds of betrayals and failed promises, on the part
of the government of the United States.
They have been taught distrust
at the hand of the Master Deceiver, who approaches them to negotiate in the
interests of an ancient and arch enemy, of
one who sits, thinly veiled, as his guiding counselor and
advisor.
About the author:
Debbie Menon is an independent
writer. She can be reached at debbiemenon@gmail.com.
... Payvand News - 11/17/08 ...
Bookmark/Share this post with:
Delicious |
Digg |
Facebook |
Furl |
Google |
Magnolia |
Newsvine |
Reddit |
Yahoo
© Copyright 2008 NetNative
(All Rights Reserved)
|
|
#