By Debbie Menon
|

Debbie Menon |
Color and Gender
seems to be of great consequence in this US election
debate, but substance: who stands for what, and who has the legacy to back such
stances, neither is promising, I am afraid. Black, white, a woman, a man,
shouldn't really matter. Shouldn't it be about substance? Collin Powell the man
was black, and Rice the woman is? They have committed or contributed to
genocide, haven't they? Does it make a difference for a Palestinian, Iraqi or
Afghani child to be killed by a bullet fired from a black, a white or even an
Arab as long as he will die or suffer his entire life as a result of the
decisions these people take?
We all, particularly in the
Western world and those places influenced by the west, have been conditioned
for too long that any racial bias, or implication of bias, is the most
despicably grievous failure of humanity, and yet, it seems that to accomplish
our goals, that might be necessary as the only, recourse.
What do we do? Embark on a
program of genocide? I don't think that is an acceptable solution.
We must find a more humane way.
Colin
Powell's "successes" and career achievements in the military were based on his
tokenhood as a young black in the right place at the correct time. After
graduating from City College in June 1958, he
was granted a commission as an Army Second Lieutenant. Powell was a professional
soldier for 35 years, during which time he held a variety of command and staff
positions and rose to the rank of General. His advancement into the higher
ranks began with his compliant cooperation with the My Lai cover-up. He has
been a tame, compliant and convenient military lapdog. Since then, he went on
to serve a White House fellowship under
President Richard Nixon.
I believe, he may have
originally had the character and the strength of conviction to have made it on
his own, had he been given the chance and had he been white but, unfortunately
he was not and he never had a chance to shed his skin and be himself. Too bad
for him and his country. Once you have signed the Faustian contract, there is
no redemption.
I suspect that Condi Rice has suffered something
similar. A brilliant woman, who is also black, struggles against two of the
major cultural barriers between her and success in America and, armed and
capable of making it on her own merits, she is still classified as a black and a
female and given a token ride on the bus whether she liked it, desired it, or
not. She too, never had much of a chance to become
Condoleeza Rice. More than perhaps Powell did, but still wearing the
same chains.
The fact that she is member in good standing of the Stanford community says all
that one can say about her political bias and basis. Stanford is the home of
the well-dressed, immaculately manicured and coiffed American Republican party,
otherwise known as the Grand Old Party, the GOP. Stanford hosts
the
Hoover Institute,
which is about as right as right can get. ("right" meaning the opposite of
"left" not the opposite of "wrong"). They are not as open, rude and crude as the
competing newcomers of the Johnny-come-lately Fascist Neocon group from
Chicago and big-business, and they carry their
weapons concealed under a veneer of academic charm, dignity and pragmatism, but
they are as autocratic, slick and vicious as are the later day Neocons from the
South End of Chicago in blue suits.
And then, there are the other competing pretenders to civility and culture, the
Skull and Bonezers from Yale. They usually live and travel well on great
amounts of old, moldy and heavily tainted money, but they come with the same
basic political philosophy and are headed toward the same place as the Stanfords
and the Chicago mob. They consider themselves superior to both because they have
been around a bit longer, but that is about the sole distinction.
It would appear that Obama is the forerunner of a similar group operating out of
Harvard Yard, another hotbed of the same wannabe
leaders of the world. They too have been around for a long time, as long if not
even longer than the Skull and Bonezer bozos. They travel under the banner of
the Democrat (Democrat, a nominal term, definitely not adjectival as in
"democratic") Party, solely because of the proximity of Harvard Yard to Boston
Commons and Scollay Square, the joint home, along with the cotton, corn and
goober fields of the Southern States, and the factories of America of the
Democrat Party.
Most Democrats, except for the elitist leaders who purport to "represent" them
but whom they actually depend upon to further and support their own personal
agenda, not that much different from the Stanforders, Yalies, Neocons, and South
Chicago mobsters, have the soil of the earth or the grime of America's
Industries under their fingernails... unbecoming dirt never associated with any
of the more socially acceptable and recognized hard-core Rightists mentioned
above.
The distinctions are fine, but it is these fine distinctions which, in the end,
make all the difference.
Many men like Faust have played the game with the Devil. Many have sought to
renege on the deal. Many have believed that they can, only lease their soul for
a few hours, for a "short-timer," and walk away free after the messy work is
done but... the Devil has learned from the mob... and once you take his first
cent, you are his, for the deal is sealed, based not on how much you negotiated
for, but the fact that you made the pact.
It is not a question of whether Obama has sold soul. He too did not get to where
he is without making the Pac. Whether he can break the deal, or whether he will
even try, is another question which has yet to be seen. No one has succeeded so
far. My gut feeling, he will at least try, the alternative is scary. I don't
mean just from a Middle East Policy standpoint, but even for his country.
Well, even
Fox News Commentator Bill O'Reilly, a smart product of, the institutions that
breed smart agents, says a lot of nice things about Obama the sincere man he
recently met for a Chat. Obama the President? We'll just have to wait and see,
won't we? Well, could be that Bill O'Reilly is just trying to put the peanut
butter on both sides of his toast. It could also be that he is an honest man,
and there are just certain things which he cannot, or will not, do! Perhaps he
is no longer the believer he once was. Some men change. I, a knee-jerk
idealistic romantic who still believes in the fundamental goodness of man
(against all available evidence) tend to go with the "honest man" option.
It is all conjecture. Brilliance
in one thing is no indicator of one's ability in other endeavors. History is all
we have to go by.
About the author: Debbie Menon is an independent writer based in Dubai. She
can be reached at debbie.menon@yahoo.com.
... Payvand News - 09/25/08 ... --