By
A.
J. Cave
"Whoever you are, from wherever
you have come, for I know you will come."
I am Kuru

Tomb of Kuru in
Iran's Fars province
They say Alexander III [336-323
BCE],
the Macedonian King who had defeated Dāriu III [336-330
BCE],
the Achaemenid Great King, in 3 pitched battles and savagely burned Pārsā
[Persepolis] to ashes, admired Great Kuru [Cyrus II, the Great, 559-530
BCE]
- the first Great King who had brought most of the known world under the sway of
the Persians over 200 years earlier.
They say when Alexander returned
from an ill-fated attempt to conquer India, Land of the Seven Rivers, all
battered and bruised, he trekked half of his army through Makran, the Desert of
Death [modern Baluchestan and Kerman], just to follow in the footsteps of Great
Kuru [pronounced Kou'rosh, Latin Cyrus].
Local folk tales had it that
Great Kuru had attempted a similar path through the barren desert and had
survived with only a handful of men.
Tens of thousands died,
reportedly some 65,000, including many camp-followers and most of women and
children who were a part of a campaigning army, so that a young Macedonian
conqueror could measure himself against the best of the Persian 'Great Kings'.
From Karmāna [modern Kerman],
what was left of Alexander and his army trekked back to the heartland of the
Persian Empire. They probably traveled along well-known royal roads that the
imperial Achaemenids had built to connect all the cities of their vast kingdom
to the Royal Cities of the Empire: Pasargadae, Pārsā, Susa, Ecbatana and
Babylon.
They say Alexander stopped at
Pasargadae [Elamite Batrakata] to visit the Tomb of Great Kuru.
According to Arrian of
Nicomedia, 2nd century Roman military commander and historian, who
wrote Anabasis of Alexander using records already over four hundred years
old, the imperial Tomb of Great Kuru at the time of Alexander was in a
well-tended and well-watered lush grassy grove with all sorts of trees planted
around it. A tree-lined Persian paradayadā. Paradise. He said the imperial
tomb was inside an ancient temple.
Whether the setting of the
imperial tomb was chosen by Great Kuru himself or by his son and heir,
Kambujiyā (Cambyses II), we do not know. But the spot, set apart from all other
imperial buildings on the highlands of Pasargadae, was masterly.
It was the first sight to come
in view of those who were approaching the plains from the south. Before
reaching the magnificent bridges, gates, palaces, columned halls, pavilions and
gardens that used to grace the once fertile plains, Persians stopped at the
imperial tomb first and paid their respects and said a prayer by the fire altars
for the Father of their Empire.
Those approaching from the east
on a well-established wide road, crossed the River Pulvār on a majestic bridge
built on three rows of five columns, and entered the imperial paradise through a
monumental gatehouse, protected by winged guardians on door jambs.
Pasargadae, known as Batrakata
in the Achaemenid Administrative Archives, was not just the first Royal City, an
Achaemenid capital, but the site of the first and final victory of the Persians
over the Medes. It was where the seeds of the first Persian Empire were
planted. Where it all started.
The Greek historians, who had
followed the bloody footprints of Alexander through the invasion of the Persian
Empire, did not bother to write much about the city of Pasargadae or the large
or small villages that the Achaemenid Administrative Archives [Persepolis
Fortification Archive - PFA] attest to their existence around Pārsā and
Pasargadae.
By Hellenic accounts the region had been devastated, plundered and raped by the
Macedonians some 6 or 7 years earlier when Alexander had first passed through
the area, looting some 6,000 talents [360,000 pounds] of gold from Pasargadae
Imperial Treasury.
What has survived in the
accounts of later Greek and Roman historians is that Alexander wanted to pay
honors to the memory of Great Kuru.
They say Alexander climbed up
the six high limestone steps and entered the imperial tomb through a small door,
too small for most. But Alexander was reportedly not too tall and somewhat
small and boyish compared to the rest of the Macedonians.
A narrow small passageway led to
the innermost of the modest gabled roof tomb chamber.
Inside, Alexander reportedly
found a desecrated golden casket on the floor between a couch with golden feet
and a small table, some scattered bones, a purple carpet, royal clothing,
daggers, earrings, and other grave goods.
Alexander ordered the imperial
tomb to be repaired and left.
They say a Macedonian was
severely punished for desecrating the Tomb of Great Kuru. The priestly Magu
[Magi] who were the guardians of the imperial tomb were tortured and later
released when found innocent of any wrong-doing.
Arrian wrote that there was an
inscription on the tomb in Persian writing that might have read:
"I am Kuru, who founded the
Empire of the Persians.
Grudge me not therefore, this
little earth that rests under my body."
Modest words for a man who had
once ruled the world. No?
They say Alexander wanted his
subjects to worship him as a Greek god for conquering the Persian Empire.
Well, the imperial Persian
Achaemenids must have been some formidable kings whose demise had created such
delusions of grandeur in the heart and mind of the young Macedonian conqueror.
Alexander died the following
year in Babylon. He was a month short of his 33 birthday. His body was
mummified and worshipped for a while in Alexandria in Egypt and finally
disappeared sometime after Egypt fell to the Romans [30
BCE].
To this day no one really knows
what happened to Alexander's remains and where he was finally buried or even if
he was ever buried. A prophecy said that the land that was to become his grave
would never see peace.
Many classical historians would
like us to believe that if Alexander had not died young, he might have done
great things by uniting the Persians and Macedonians.
But we will never know.
What we do know is that his
actions were those of a conqueror who enjoyed constant warfare. From the
surviving accounts of his battles during the first known invasion of Asia by a
'European' power, an estimated half a million men, women and children were
either slaughtered or sold into slavery.
But there is no need to guess at
what Great Kuru could have accomplished. He achieved greatness in his own
lifetime by creating a magnificent peaceful empire of many lands and many
people: envied and feared, but above all, loved.
Macedonians in turn fell to the
Romans and Macedonia became a Roman Province in 149
BCE.
Romans gave the epithet of 'Great' to Alexander for the sheer size of his bloody
conquests.
While Great Kuru unified Asia
and the imperial Persian Achaemenids created the first great world empire that
prospered for over two hundred years, 'Alexandrian' empire did not survive
Alexander. Bloody wars that broke almost immediately between his Macedonian
generals after his death, shattered the territorial integrity of the Persian
Empire.
Asia literally broke into
hostile pieces.
Regional hostilities that were
successfully suppressed by Great Kuru and the imperial Achaemenids, resurfaced
during the period of continual wars between Alexander's successors, known as
Diadochi. Macedonian rivalries soaked the lands with more blood for decades.
Macedonian invaders still left
in Persia were finally defeated by the Parthids [Akāniāns] in 247
BCE.
Parthids were another great Iranian dynasty who tied themselves to the imperial
Achaemenids. Later, Parthids cavalry withstood the Roman aggressors, often
defeating the Roman legions.
No one can say with any
certainty that the royal Parthids were really related to the imperial
Achaemenids by blood. But the memory of the Persian Achaemenids was still so
powerful that the two successive Iranian dynasties of Parthids and Sassanids,
both claimed to be heirs to the imperial Achaemenids.
Sassanids [Sāssānians] rose to
power from the same region as Achaemenids [modern Fars] in the 3rd
century and became known as the second great Persian Empire in the history. For
four centuries, Sassanids battled the Romans and then the Byzantine Empire.
There are no records of what
happened to what was left in the imperial Tomb of Great Kuru after Alexander's
visit.
One could only hope and pray
that the Mazdean Athravans [Zoroastrian priests] quietly removed, purified,
blessed and buried the mortal remains of the beloved Great King of the Persians
in a secret grave nearby, so that it was never to be desecrated again by Anāryā
[non-Aryans, foreigners] - ignorant of the religion of the Achaemenids and the
sanctity and purity of burial chambers.
The Tomb of Great Kuru is empty
today.
It has been empty for many
centuries.
It has withstood the brutal
hands of time and wave after wave of bloody conquerors that came after
Alexander.
But the Iranians have always
outwitted gods and men to protect the imperial Tomb of Great Kuru.
According to ancient folk tales,
when the Bedouin Arab invaders came to destroy the Tomb of Great Kuru in the 7th
century, Iranians protected the tomb of the beloved emperor by renaming it:
"Ghabr_e Mādar_e Sulaiman" [Grave of the Mother of Prophet Solomon]. The
ancient tomb was spared and declared sacred.
The passage of time eventually
erased the memory of the imperial Achaemenids from the written pages of Iranian
history, but their oral legends were reinvented by the remarkable Iranian poets
culminating in the magnificent Epic of Shāh Nāmeh [Book of Kings] by the
incomparable Ferdowsi, as the mythical and legendary Iranian dynasties.
In the 13th century,
the ancient tomb was tuned into a mosque. Women prayed in the mosque and burned
incense. Men were not allowed inside.
Many years passed... and then many
centuries...
Lush meadows dried and tall
trees withered.
Walls of the aging tomb cracked;
portions of the gabled roof broke; the ceiling leaked and stone steps chipped.
Imperial Achaemenid
inscriptions, if any, disappeared altogether.
Whatever that could be done to
mend the aging tomb and preserve it for the next generations, was done. No, not
everything was done according to some ancient code of building, long forgotten.
But the best that could have been done by whatever means that were available.
While some cursed hands
deliberately damaged the ancient tomb out of malice or ignorance or both, other
blessed hands prayed and spackled and mended the beloved treasure. Somehow many
knew it was imperative to protect the ancient tomb at any cost... that it once
belonged to someone who meant the world to his people...
It did.
And it does.
There is a timeless beauty and
dignity in the austere massive stones that have seen some 2,500+ cycles of the
sun.
A faded, damaged and barely
visible 12-petaled stone rosette still stubbornly hangs to the ancient stone
above the small door to the tomb chamber. Some say it is a symbol of the twelve
months of the year - a full cycle of the sun.
But the modest unpretentious
tomb was never admired solely for its own simple beauty and majesty. It was
treasured for what it once kept lovingly within its stony bones: the mortal
remains of a man loved by the Persians who called him their king and father of
their first glorious empire.
Even when his name was
forgotten, the love of his subjects shielded his tomb from the ravages of the
merciless god of time and hands of pitiless destruction.
Love never dies.
The ancient tomb remains a small
monument to the larger-than-life memory of Great Kuru. A modest celebration in
remembrance of a man who belongs to the greater mankind who loves and admires
the humanity of an ancient Persian Great King. An emperor who was magnanimous
to his friends and foes alike.
Another round of restorations
started recently to mend the ancient ceiling of the imperial tomb that had been
leaking again during the rainy season.
The alarming news and
photographs of damages done to the ceiling of the Tomb of Great Kuru during the
course of this restoration surfaced in November of 2008 by
Mehr News
Agency.

The authorities of the Iranian
Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts Organization (ICHTHO) and the Parsa
Pasargadae Research Foundation (PPRF) denied the news. They claimed that to the
contrary, the same photographs showed the real story and the public could
independently judge the restoration or destruction of the cultural inheritance
of the country for themselves.
The Tomb of Great Kuru is a
UNESCO World Heritage Site.
While a report of the latest
restoration has been filed with the international agency, such report has not
been made available publicly.
The issue remains open.
So while we patiently await the
availability of all official reports, we recognize that still much work is
needed to fully restore the imperial Tomb of Great Kuru.
The greater community of the
world eminent scholars and archeological experts are very eager to help. Many
are even willing to generously donate their valuable time and efforts for free.
There is no pre or post Islamic
history of Iran. Like a magnificent Persian carpet, it is all the history of
the great Iranian people woven together with a single glorious thread.
Good thoughts, good words, good
deeds... and the freedom to choose.
Let us choose well.
Part Two:
I am Kuru
So, who was Great Kuru who
meant so much to his people?
About the author:
A. J. Cave is an Iranian-American writer based in California, USA and a
member of Stanford University's World Association of International Studies (WAIS).
She is currently working on her second historical novel Cyrus Romance:
Kuru Nāmeh. Information about her first historical novel Roxana
Romance: Roanak Nāmeh is available at
www.pavasta.com.
Selected Sources
Arrian, The Campaigns of
Alexander, translated by Aubrey De Sélincourt (London: Penguin Books, 1958)
Bosworth, A. B.: Alexander
and the East (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998)
Bosworth, A. B.: Conquest and
Empire: The Reign of Alexander the Great (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1988)
Briant, Pierre: From Cyrus to
Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire, translated by Peter T. Daniels
(Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2002)
Heckel, Waldemar:
The Wars of Alexander the Great, 336-323
BC
(New York: Routledge, 2002)
Kuhrt, Amélie: The Persian
Empire: A Corpus of Sources from the Achaemenid Period, 2 Vols. (New York:
Routledge, 2007)
Matheson, Sylvia A.: Persia:
An Archaeological Guide (New Jersey: Noyes Press, 1973)
Mehr, Farhang: Zoroastrian
Tradition: An Introduction to the Ancient Wisdom of Zarathushtra (Costa
Mesa: Mazda Publishers, Inc., 2003)
Sami, Ali: Pasargadae, The
Oldest Imperial Capital of Iran, translated by R. N. Sharp (Shiraz: Musavi
Print, 1956)
Stronach, David: Pasargadae:
a report of the excavation conducted by the British Institute of Persian
Studies, from 1961 to 1963 (New York: Clarendon Press, 1978)
The Landmark Herodotus: The
Histories,
edited by Robert B. Strassler with an introduction by Rosalind Thomas (New York:
Pantheon Books, 2007)
... Payvand News - 03/16/09 ... --