A satellite view of Fordow facility near Qom, Iran.
Photograph: DIGITAL GLOBE
Speaker of Parliament Ali Larijani said that the resolution shows that all the
nuclear negotiations were not geared to reach an agreement, but to mislead Iran.
Larijani, Iran's former chief nuclear negotiator, added that Tehran would carefully watch the next moves by the world powers "and act accordingly."
A day earlier, Iran's ambassador to the IAEA, Ali-Asghar Soltanieh, said that the resolution had pushed Iran to limit its voluntary cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. He warned that future cooperation would be solely within the areas covered by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
Reza Taghizadeh, a political analyst based in Glasgow, Scotland, told RFE/RL that the parliament's move goes against the recent IAEA resolution.
"If there is any nuclear site that Iran hasn't reported along with Fordow to the IAEA, Iran may [now] decide against reporting the existence of such a site to the IAEA," Taghizadeh said.
He says the two sides are moving apart from each other and that could add to the tensions between Tehran and the international community over Iran's sensitive nuclear activities.
Iran says all its nuclear activities are peaceful, but Western countries suspect Iran of secretly developing nuclear weapons.
Iranian lawmakers today said that they believe the political will of some big powers, specifically the United States and Britain, are behind this latest development.
The lawmakers condemned the IAEA resolution as politicized and said that Iran's nuclear case should be returned to the IAEA from the UN Security Council.
Kazem Jalali, the rapporteur for the Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, said U.S. President Barack Obama has failed to change U.S. policies toward Iran.
"When Obama came to power he spoke of change," Jalali said. "Many thought that [the slogan] of change is serious. The Islamic Republic didn't judge hastily, it said maybe they really want to create change. A proof of change would be for the extremist policies of the Bush era not to rule in the White House anymore."
Jalali added that the IAEA resolution proved the UN body and world powers were using double standards.
"What is the use of following international commitments but not having any rights in return?" Jalali asked in an interview with state television.
The IAEA resolution was passed November 27 with the rare support of China and Russia, which have good ties with the Islamic Republic. Only Venezuela, Cuba, and Malaysia voted against it.
Fatemeh Alia, a conservative lawmaker, said today that Iran should revise its ties with countries which had voted against Tehran at the IAEA.
On November 28, another Iranian lawmaker, Mohammad Karamirad, suggested that Iran could consider withdrawing from the NPT in reaction to the IAEA censure.
... Payvand News - 11/29/09 ... --