Source:
International Campaign for Human Rights
in Iran
Sadegh Larijani and pressure on the Judiciary
for executing dissidents: has justice given in to politics?
Sadegh Larijani, Head of Iranian Judiciary, said
on Sunday that a group in Iran are demanding "accelerated" punishment of
protesters arrested during the post-elections events in Iran. He has added that
such demands are politically-motivated and illegal. Though Larijani's statement
reveals immense political pressure for harsh handling of those arrested
post-elections, it does not reveal who these groups and individuals are. More
importantly, Larijani's words do not indicate how involved these groups and
individuals have been during the arrests, abuses of prisoners for extracting
confessions, heavy prison sentences, and implementation of death sentences,
hijacking control over the Judiciary, from the inexperienced Head of the
organization.

Sadegh Larijani
Larijani has also omitted clarification on why
only a few days after the executions of Mohammad Ali Zamani and Arash
Rahmanipour, which brought on international condemnation of the action, he is
discussing the expectations of certain groups and political pressures. Could the
two executions have been results of his referenced pressures? Why else would
Larijani, who now has two executions on his report card and scores of other
questionable execution verdicts on his desk, reveal for the first time a trend
which has been taking shape over the past few months, saying: "Despite past
warnings, some people keep expecting more of the Judiciary and these political
expectations are against the law and Sharia?" Is this the Head of the
Judiciary's way of showing his concern over a quickly-spinning-out-of-control
Judiciary through political pressures exerted by security and military
organizations? Unfortunately, none of these questions are answered in Mr.
Larijani's statements.
For those who have been following the Judiciary's
situation after the June 12, 2009 elections, political decisions, unfair trials,
irregular investigations, and an overtly politicized judicial system are nothing
new. During the months right after the elections, some conservative newspapers,
many Friday Prayers' preachers, high-ranking pro-government clerics, and many
IRGC and Police commanders have explicitly spoken about use of violence against
the protesters. Using force and violence for intimidating the government's
opposition in an attempt to keep them from continuing their protests went so far
that Parliament Member Ruhollah Hosseinian submitted a bill to Iranian
Parliament, demanding accelerated executions of dissidents. Illegal arrests,
heavy prison sentences without any reason or evidence, or prison abuse for the
unnamed groups about whom Larijani is speaking, seem to not have been enough and
now they are accusing the Iranian Judiciary of "negligence."
But Sadegh Larijani who was talking at a high
level judicial authorities' gathering on January 31, insisted that executions of
Mohammad Ali Zamani and Arash Rahmanipour last week were legal. He said: "These
two carried arms and belonged to heretic and terrorist groups, or had been
arrested carrying explosives."

Arash Rahmanipour (left) and
Mohammad Ali Zamani
Also, regarding the treatment of the executed
individuals he said: "During the entire review stages, the penal code was
strictly followed in their cases." But attorneys of both individuals said in
different interviews that their clients had confessed to crimes they had not
committed. Confessing to uncommitted crimes has been a frequent occurrence after
the Islamic Revolution in Iran, but it has happened increasingly over the past
four years. Political influences and a disregard for due process are clearly
visible throughout the case files of the two individuals executed this week,
whether in their case process or the way they were executed, and Larijani's
statements about these executions clearly indicate that the Judiciary has caved
in under pressures. One of the attorneys of the two executed convicts told
International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran that his client had been told
that if he confessed he would be released soon, but the confessions obviously
cost him his life.
He calls these pressures "political and illegal,"
but there is no doubt that as Head of the Judiciary and having taken over this
new post a few months after the elections, during the show trials of prominent
reformist politicians, Larijani is fully responsible for the illegal arrests,
the bad condition of Iranian prisons, attempts for extracting fake confessions
from political prisoners, unwarranted death sentences, and a lack of will to
deal with prison abusers and street thugs. He seems to be aware of political
pressure, so he can't ignore the fact that most of the arrests, trials, and
sentences after the elections have taken place under such political pressure and
if he believes these pressures are "illegal," and "illegitimate," he must
immediately review these arrests and prison and execution sentences, holding the
culprits accountable.
... Payvand News - 02/02/10 ... --