By David N. Rahni, New York (September 2010)
Saddam Hossein was indeed tyrannical
for his systematic and repressive mistreatment of his own nationals especially
the Kurds and the Shiites whom cumulatively comprise 80% of the Iraq
population. His unilateral aggression against Iraq's neighbors, namely Iran
and Kuwait, is still painfully felt; he inflicted on humanity well over a
million killed and nearly a trillion dollars of economic and environmental loss
during his reign. As a former CIA per diem agent, he was, nonetheless,
able to impose and sustain a non-sectarian government, and a securely sovereign
Iraq that extended certain equal civil rights to women, and brought about a
myriad of modernization schemes. That said, However, thanks [but no thanks]
to the U.S. intervention on a trumped up pretext of weapons of mass
destructions, we have now destabilized Iraq and the region in ruins, with
a giant step backwards to a quagmire where the old tribal and religious
conflicts have reverberated. The country's infrastructure is in a shamble as it
has witnessed mass exodus of its elites, intellectuals, capitals and national
treasure troves, while the ordinary Iraqis neither believe in themselves nor in
the government we have fostered there any longer.

In retrospect, one
can only surmise as to whether or not it was in the best interest of the
American people to wage this endless war against Iraq. Was the one and only
aim to remove Hossein or there were some ulterior motives having to do with the
multinational conglomerates' and/or some third country's agenda? I reckon
history could only tell. What benefit if any we or the people of Iraq have
gained thus far from this war that is declared "over," and yet it continues at
many fronts. It has led to the loss of the lives of thousands of honorable
American soldiers, the loss of trillions of US tax payers' money, and the
tarnishing of American credibility and leadership worldwide. The American
foreign policy, under President Bush presumably influenced by his biblical
prophetic psyche, was to alienate most Muslims, empower totalitarian regimes in
the Near Eastern region, which in effect increased the number and intensity of
terrorists and terrorism. This foreign policy curtailed Islamic reformation and
indigenous social and political reform, a struggle that in places like Iran has
commenced with their 1906 Constitutional movement, and still continues to-date.
However, if for
the first time since World War II, we are genuinely interested in fostering
democracy, reformation and modernization, the essential pillars of a mutually
beneficial sustainable development in the region, we need a different
fundamental strategy and a tactical shift of paramount ramification in terms of
our long-term foreign policy. To start with, an immediate, unconditional
withdrawal of our forces in their entirety, and an acknowledgment of our grave
mistakes, would undoubtedly usher in a new era of reconciliation, first on the
domestic and then on the international front. It is past time for the
reinvigoration of our " government of the people, by the people and for the
people", and to reaffirm to the international community that what we preach is
what we truly practice ourselves.
About the author: The author, an American patriot of proud
Iranian heritage, is a professor of chemistry (www.drrahni.com),
and president of Chemical Detective, LLC (www.chemdetective.com)
... Payvand News - 09/08/10 ... --