By Nader Bagherzadeh
Contrary to inaccurate and biased US media reports, Iran is in fact in full compliance of its obligations under the IAEA’s Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Even the latest IAEA report cannot deny this fact, but the US media, in a misleading effort, insists on reporting only those areas that the IAEA has put on its wish list for Iran to fulfill which is commonly referred to as Possible Military Dimensions or PMD. The wish-list is not a requirement under Iran’s current Comprehensive Safeguard Agreement (CSA). Iran’s existing CSA protects her inalienable right to carry out any and all research related to nuclear technology, as long as bomb grade nuclear material is not involved, and there is not a single evidence of this violation.
Notwithstanding Iran’s full compliance, the IAEA now wants more intrusive inspections beyond Iran's CSA. These intrusive inspections are commonly referred to as the Additional Protocols (AP) On the surface of it, the request for AP seems reasonable as it will allow inspectors to go anywhere they wish, to talk to anyone they deem appropriate, and have all the information about future plans for nuclear facilities even before construction has begun. But the request is highly suspect as this demand is not extended to all NPT member countries, once again, demonstrating double-standards.
If in fact, the goal was confidence building and applicable to all NPT nations as opposed to making such a demand with threats, it would have been worthy of consideration by the Iranian government, as well as all other NPT member states. Regrettably, this is not the case: cyber-attacks, assassination of nuclear scientists, and draconian sanctions that directly impact millions of Iranians have been the norm for dealing with Iran’s nuclear debacle.
It is not prudent for the leadership in Iran to accept AP while President Obama continues with his belligerent accusation of Iran being a nuclear threat for the world when in fact the intelligence community in the US reaffirmed last week the 2007 assessment that Iran is not working on nuclear weapons. Mr. Obama’s suggestion while addressing AIPAC that Iran is planning to “wipe out Israel off the map,” is another canard that is not supported by facts. In reality, Iran should be complaining against the daily threats of attack by Israel and US. If peaceful enrichment of uranium under the watchful eyes of the IAEA cameras and inspectors is considered a threat to world peace, then Iran’s agreement with the IAEA and her inalienable rights is completely ignored by nuclear weapons states that are party to the NPT.
Accepting AP is tantamount to providing information about non-nuclear military sensitive sites that will be added to the target list of those countries that are threatening Iran with military strikes. Also, this will jeopardize the lives of tens of scientists and engineers that the IAEA wants to talk to as part of their new demands. Iran’s relaxed and naive approach to protecting the scientists has cost the lives of 5 nuclear experts so far, and the AP may exasperate this situation.
To be clear, no American administration, current or future, will have the courage to accept Iran’s peaceful enrichment activity, even if the work is done under the watchful eyes of the IAEA cameras and inspector’s regular visits. The reason is that the government of Israel and their cronies in US Congress, the main stream media, and numerous pro-Israel think tanks around DC will vehemently oppose such a bold, but justified decision. Judging from the Israeli leaders’ recent statements, their main reason to go to war with Iran is not that Iran has a nuclear bomb, but the fear that Iran’s advances in technology may embolden Iran and her allies in resisting Israeli aggression.
This fear mongering has served Israel very well. Not only it has resulted in US and her allies to put in place the toughest sanctions ever on a country, impacting millions of Iranians, but it has covered up the disastrous Palestinian settlement issue. The Prime Minister of Israel should be commended for his skills in steering global concern and discussions away from the plight of the Palestinians to the saber rattling on her arch enemy, Iran. Unfortunately, the Palestinian issue is a time bomb that will surface regardless of Israel’s intentions to strike Iran. One of the side effects of this immoral and illegal preemptive war is that the Middle East problems will get worse before getting better, with many unintended consequences.
The only way forward for Iran and US is for these two countries to find ways of dialing down the rhetorical statements by both sides. In order to reach this goal, the advice of Mr. Dobbins and others is the key. That is, there should be many bilateral meetings without the participation of any of the other P5 members, in order to identify common grounds where further negotiations can be initiated.
- What Are Iran's Intentions? - Noam Chomsky
- Anti Iran Media Blitz: Is Iran a Real Threat, or is the Hype a Diversionary Tactic Serving Other Agendas?
- HOLY, MOLLY - Cyrus and that part of Iranian-Jews History keep echoing, resonating, reverberating.... They want to attack their old homeland Yahudieh (literally meaning Jewish quarter, the village that gave rise to Esfahan, after the advent of Islam, where they settled down after their migration from Egypt -Exodus)?!? -Roya Monajem, Tehran
- Iran not trying to build nuclear bomb, 16 US intel agencies say
- US General: "Iran a Rational Actor", but is US one?
- Khamenei's Nuclear Narrative
- Israeli Iran attack? What goes around comes around
- We've seen the threats against Iran before
- I Beg To Differ! Is Iran Really In The Crosshairs? I Think Not
- As US and Iran Confront Each other, where is the Diplomacy?
- Former Officials Call for President Obama to Reinvigorate Iran Diplomacy
- A Nuclear-Armed Iran: A Blessing In Disguise
- Iranians condemn threats of military attack against Iran
- In Iran, Talk Of Military Strikes From Above Raises Fears Below -
... Payvand News - 03/09/12 ... --